or register as

or sign in with

Creating Balanced Teams for a Funded Startup

Opteamyzer Creating Balanced Teams for a Funded Startup Author Author: Yu Qi
Creating Balanced Teams for a Funded Startup Photo by Hanson Lu
Main / Knowledge Center / Creating Balanced Teams for a Funded Startup

Situation:

Imagine a startup in the FMCG sector (Fast-Moving Consumer Goods) has received substantial funding. The founders aim to allocate resources wisely to not only maintain stable production but also to reach a new level of growth while avoiding common pitfalls.

One of the key success factors is building effective teams. Optimally selecting personality types within departments and ensuring harmonious interdepartmental interactions can:

  • Increase employee productivity.
  • Reduce staff turnover.
  • Lower employee stress and minimize hidden costs.

By implementing these measures, it’s even possible to partially reduce payroll costs since satisfied employees often agree to work for slightly lower salaries in a comfortable environment.

Company Structure and Quantitative Metrics

Assume the company consists of 8 key departments necessary for FMCG operations:

  1. Marketing and PR (brand development and promotion).
  2. Production and Supplier Relations (core manufacturing operations).
  3. Research and Development (new product creation).
  4. IT Department (infrastructure support and tool development).
  5. Design Department (visual content creation).
  6. Management Team (company leadership).
  7. Accounting (financial management).
  8. Legal and HR (legal support and personnel management).
Average Salary Requirements (in USD, Annual):
  • Regular employee: $40,000–$60,000.
  • Mid-level manager: $70,000–$90,000.
  • Department head: $100,000–$120,000.
Average Team Sizes:
  • 3–6 people in most departments except Accounting and Legal (2–3 people each).
  • Total: ~40–50 employees.

Potential Savings Through Harmonious Teams

  • Reduced turnover: savings of up to 20% on employee replacement (recruitment, onboarding).
  • Conflict reduction: increased productivity by 15–20%.
  • Burnout prevention: savings on sick leave and overtime payouts.

Total: Proper selection of personality types could save the company up to $500,000 annually while maintaining (or even increasing) productivity.

Team Formation: Distribution of Personality Types

1. Marketing and PR (5 people)

Responsibilities:

  • Creating and promoting the brand.
  • Analyzing market trends.
  • Engaging with clients through advertising and PR.

Socionic Types:

Why It Works:

  • ILE and IEE generate unique ideas and creative concepts that capture consumer attention.
  • LIE and LSI provide systematic planning and execution of ideas.

Salary Requirements:

  • Creatives (ILE, IEE): $50,000 x 2.
  • Organizers (LIE, LSI): $80,000 x 2.
  • Assistant (any type): $40,000.

Total: $260,000.

2. Production and Suppliers (6 people)

Responsibilities:

  • Quality control of products.
  • Logistics and resource management.
  • Supplier relations.

Socionic Types:

Why It Works:

  • SLI and LSE ensure stability, attention to detail, and process efficiency.
  • ILI introduces innovations to reduce costs.

Salary Requirements:

  • Logistics and operators (SLI, LSE): $50,000 x 4.
  • Analyst (ILI): $70,000.

Total: $270,000.

3. Research and Development (4 people)

Responsibilities:

  • Generating ideas for new products.
  • Conducting tests and experiments.
  • Implementing innovations.

Socionic Types:

Why It Works:

  • ILE and IEE stimulate the creation of new ideas.
  • LII tests ideas for feasibility, offering logically sound solutions.

Salary Requirements:

  • Researchers (ILE, IEE): $60,000 x 2.
  • Analyst (LII): $70,000.

Total: $190,000.

4. IT Department (5 people)

Responsibilities:

  • Developing and maintaining IT infrastructure.
  • Automating processes.

Socionic Types:

Why It Works:

  • LII and ILI develop solutions and analyze tasks.
  • SLI ensures execution and maintains stability.

Salary Requirements:

  • IT Analysts (LII, ILI): $70,000 x 2.
  • Technicians (SLI): $50,000 x 3.

Total: $290,000.

5. Design Department (3 people)

Responsibilities:

  • Visual product design.
  • Branding development.

Socionic Types:

Why It Works:

  • SEI and ESE possess a well-developed sense of form and aesthetics, creating visually appealing designs.
  • ILE helps generate new concepts.

Salary Requirements:

  • Designers (SEI, ESE): $60,000 x 2.
  • Creative (ILE): $70,000.

Total: $190,000.

6. Management Team (4 people)

Responsibilities:

  • Setting goals.
  • Coordinating departments.
  • Strategic planning.

Socionic Types:

Why It Works:

  • LIE and EIE provide strategic vision and motivation for the team.
  • LSI ensures precision and adherence to plans.

Salary Requirements:

  • Leader (LIE): $120,000.
  • Coordinators (EIE, LSI): $90,000 x 2.

Total: $300,000.

Analysis of Interdepartmental Relationships with the Proposed Socionic Distribution

Balancing socionic types within departments helps optimize internal workflows, but interdepartmental interactions can become a source of additional challenges if intertype relations are not considered. Let’s analyze potential conflicts and strategies to minimize them:

1. Potential Conflicts:
  • Departments led by more rational types, such as LSI (ISTj) and LIE (ENTj), may find it challenging to collaborate with creative types like ILE (ENTp) and IEE (ENFp), due to differences in approach (systematic vs. flexible).
  • IT teams comprising SLI (ISTp) and LII (INTj) may have communication gaps with Marketing and Design, where emotional engagement and rapid iterations dominate.
2. Strategies for Mitigation:
  • Structured Feedback: Establish clear communication channels and frameworks that allow systematic feedback from rational departments without stifling creativity in flexible teams.
  • Regular Alignment Meetings: Organize periodic interdepartmental syncs with representatives from each socionic type to build understanding and mitigate potential clashes before they escalate.
  • Role Clarity: Define precise roles and responsibilities, ensuring that creative ideas are channeled through structured processes for evaluation and execution.
3. Fostering Synergy:
  • Pairing EIE (ENFj) from leadership with creative teams (e.g., Design or R&D) can enhance motivation and align departmental goals through emotional intelligence and vision.
  • Using LIE (ENTj) to mediate between production and IT ensures that innovative solutions align with operational efficiency.

By considering both internal and external interactions between socionic types, companies can reduce the likelihood of conflict, enhance cross-departmental collaboration, and maximize overall productivity and employee satisfaction.

1. Key Types of Interdepartmental Interactions

1. Marketing and PR ↔ Production:

Potential Issues:

  • Different work paces: Marketers ( IEE (ENFp), ILE (ENTp) ) tend to generate ideas faster than production teams ( SLI (ISTp), LSE (ESTj) ) can implement them.
  • Conflict between creativity and practicality: Marketing may demand innovative solutions that production deems unrealistic or too costly.

Recommendations:

  • Regular meetings to align objectives.
  • Appointing a mediator from LIE (ENTj) to coordinate expectations.
2. Marketing and PR ↔ Research:

Potential Issues:

  • Marketers may push for quick solutions for launches, while researchers ( LII (INTj), ILE (ENTp) ) prefer thorough analysis and dislike haste.
  • Risk of misunderstanding due to differing priorities: commercial focus versus theoretical exploration.

Recommendations:

  • Implementing clear KPIs for the research department tied to marketing requests.
  • Organizing joint brainstorming sessions.
3. Marketing and PR ↔ IT:

Potential Issues:

  • Creative ideas from marketing ( IEE (ENFp), ILE (ENTp) ) may seem vague or poorly defined to IT teams ( LII (INTj), SLI (ISTp) ).
  • Different perceptions of timelines: IT prefers precise plans, while marketers lean toward flexibility.

Recommendations:

  • Introducing a unified task management tool (e.g., Trello or Jira).
  • Defining a clear format for task requests.
4. Production ↔ Research

Potential Issues:

  • The production department ( SLI (ISTp), LSE (ESTj) ) focuses on completing current tasks, while the research team ( ILE (ENTp), LII (INTj) ) prioritizes long-term development, which can lead to disagreements.
  • Production teams may be skeptical about the feasibility of innovations proposed by researchers.

Recommendations:

  • Regular testing of new ideas on a small scale before integrating them into full production.
  • Involving SLI (ISTp) as a mediator due to their ability to understand both perspectives.
5. Production ↔ IT

Potential Issues:

  • IT specialists ( LII (INTj), ILI (INTp) ) may perceive production teams ( SLI (ISTp), LSE (ESTj) ) as overly "routine-oriented" or inflexible.
  • Production teams may view IT as "detached from reality" due to their theoretical approach to problem-solving.

Recommendations:

  • Joint work sessions to align processes and goals.
  • Appointing ILI (INTp) to find compromise technical solutions that satisfy both departments.
6. Production ↔ Design

Potential Issues:

  • Conflicts between the realistic approach of production teams ( SLI (ISTp), LSE (ESTj) ) and the creative ambitions of designers ( ESE (ESFj), ILE (ENTp) ).
  • Misunderstanding the importance of details: Production teams may oversimplify tasks, while designers demand additional resources to maintain quality.

Recommendations:

  • Developing clear technical specifications for projects.
  • Regular alignment meetings at all stages of project implementation to ensure mutual understanding.
7. Design ↔ Marketing and PR

Potential Issues:

  • Competition for the role of the "primary idea generator" between the marketing team ( IEE (ENFp), ILE (ENTp) ) and the design team ( ESE (ESFj), SEI (ISFp) ).
  • Marketing may demand quick adaptations of designs, conflicting with the thorough approach required by the design team to ensure quality.

Recommendations:

  • Appointing EIE (ENFj) as a mediator to smooth over conflicts and facilitate collaboration.
  • Introducing a shared system for evaluating project success (e.g., based on customer engagement metrics).
8. Management Team ↔ All Departments

Potential Issues:

Recommendations:

  • Establishing open communication channels across all departments.
  • Regular meetings with each department to discuss issues and gather feedback.
9. Accounting ↔ Other Departments

Potential Issues:

  • Accounting staff ( LSI (ISTj), SLI (ISTp) ) may be perceived as "slowing down" processes due to their focus on budget constraints.
  • Conflicts might arise over rejections of funding requests from designers, marketers, or researchers.

Recommendations:

  • Involving LSE (ESTj) in prioritizing funding decisions to balance constraints with project importance.
  • Providing transparent explanations for financial decisions to improve understanding and acceptance.
10. Legal and HR ↔ Other Departments

Potential Issues:

Recommendations:

  • Clearly defining responsibilities between HR and line managers to ensure smooth workflows.
  • Leveraging EIE (ENFj) to enhance corporate culture and resolve interpersonal issues effectively.

Conclusions and Summary

Total Annual Salary Requirements: ~$1,750,000.

However, thanks to harmonious interactions and reduced employee turnover, this amount could decrease by ~20%. In our example, using Opteamyzer on a small FMCG production setup could save approximately $350,000 annually.

Proper socionic type distribution creates a work environment where:

  • Employees feel valued.
  • Conflicts are minimal.
  • Productivity increases.

In a highly competitive market, this is not just a bonus but a critical success factor that enables the startup to maintain leadership and justify investor trust.